linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drivers-x86 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VcJau2Yeg8Y_fMFbTsECxOBi+OvXVN58__JvB9GfiAu9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jun 2018 17:55:00 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Haruka Kawajiri <yukx00@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drivers-x86 tree

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:33 PM,  <dvhart@...radead.org> wrote:
> On June 1, 2018 5:08:32 AM PDT, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 14:40:35 +0300 Andy Shevchenko
>><andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Oops. What is the proposed fix for that? It seems we can't rebase
>>> published branches.
>>
>>It's unfixable without a rebase, so you could instead consider it an
>>opportunity to improve your processes for the future. :-)
>
> Yeah, in this case we have to do a rebase.
>
> Andy, I've been wanting to look at using some simple bots and tags for this kind of thing. GitHub makes this really easy, might be time to move. We'll continue this offline.
>
> For now, please rebase next to correct the error as this change is on top of any of my commits, we won't make things worse by you recommitting my commits.

Done.

Author has been informed.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko