[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180601160407.GC1058@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 18:04:07 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
james.morris@...rosoft.com, keescook@...omium.org,
peterz@...radead.org, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] signal: simplify rt_sigaction()
On 06/01, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> The goto is not needed and does not add any clarity. Simply return -EINVAL
> on unexpected sigset_t struct size directly.
Agreed, sys_rt_sigaction() looks just ugly and mixes goto/return on failure,
ACK
Powered by blists - more mailing lists