linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] lib/rhashtable: convert param sanitations to WARN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180601165903.bd3jonbv2jrfcevi@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:   Sat, 2 Jun 2018 00:59:03 +0800
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        tgraf@...g.ch, manfred@...orfullife.com, mhocko@...nel.org,
        guillaume.knispel@...ersonicimagine.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] lib/rhashtable: convert param sanitations to WARN_ON

On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 09:53:47AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>
> Curious, are these users setting up the param structure dynamically
> or something that they can pass along bogus values?
> 
> If that's the case then yes, I definitely agree.

It's just a quality of implementation issue.  This is a generic API.
Sure for early-boot users like yours it makes sense to just WARN_ON
rather than deal with the messy hash table allocation failure.

But for a driver author writing some kernel module it isn't nice
to WARN_ON and then crash on a NULL-pointer dereference when we
can cleanly fail the table init.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt