linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 10/17] signal: make has_pending

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180601174553.GB23669@mailbox.org>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jun 2018 19:45:53 +0200
From:   Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
To:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        james.morris@...rosoft.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/17] signal: make has_pending_signals() return bool

On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 06:16:58PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 06/01, Christian Brauner wrote:
> >
> > has_pending_signals() already behaves like a boolean function. Let's
> > actually declare it as such too.
> 
> But this patch does more.
> 
> > -	case 4: ready  = signal->sig[3] &~ blocked->sig[3];
> > -		ready |= signal->sig[2] &~ blocked->sig[2];
> > -		ready |= signal->sig[1] &~ blocked->sig[1];
> > -		ready |= signal->sig[0] &~ blocked->sig[0];
> > +	case 4:
> > +		ready = signal->sig[3] & ~blocked->sig[3];
> > +		ready |= signal->sig[2] & ~blocked->sig[2];
> > +		ready |= signal->sig[1] & ~blocked->sig[1];
> > +		ready |= signal->sig[0] & ~blocked->sig[0];
> >  		break;
> 
> Again, personally I do not care at all. But why do you think the code looks
> better after re-formatting? This is subjective, but to me it does not.
> 
> In particular, note the extra space before "=" removed by this patch. I guess
> it was added on purpose, and to me
> 
> 	ready  = signal->sig[3] &~ blocked->sig[3];
> 	ready |= signal->sig[2] &~ blocked->sig[2];
> 
> actually looks better thab
> 
> 	ready = signal->sig[3] &~ blocked->sig[3];
> 	ready |= signal->sig[2] &~ blocked->sig[2];
> 
> after your patch.

I can drop the changes in v3.

Thanks!
Christian

> 
> Oleg.
>