linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/18] rhashtable: use bit_spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9bea77df-e7db-677a-31b2-710dc6d956ee@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 2 Jun 2018 05:53:46 -0400
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Cc:     Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] rhashtable: use bit_spin_locks to protect hash
 bucket.



On 06/02/2018 01:03 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
 
> Yes the concept looks good to me.  But I would like to hear from
> Eric/Dave as to whether this would be acceptable for existing
> network hash tables such as the ones in inet.


What about lockdep support ?