[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180602103653.18181-12-christian@brauner.io>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2018 12:36:47 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mingo@...nel.org, james.morris@...rosoft.com,
keescook@...omium.org, peterz@...radead.org, sds@...ho.nsa.gov,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
oleg@...hat.com, Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/17] signal: make recalc_sigpending_tsk() return bool
recalc_sigpending_tsk() already behaves like a boolean function. Let's
actually declare it as such too.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
---
v2->v3:
* unchanged
v1->v2:
* unchanged
v0->v1:
* patch added
---
kernel/signal.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index c2af9a7f73b3..41f9b91db209 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -138,20 +138,21 @@ static inline bool has_pending_signals(sigset_t *signal, sigset_t *blocked)
#define PENDING(p,b) has_pending_signals(&(p)->signal, (b))
-static int recalc_sigpending_tsk(struct task_struct *t)
+static bool recalc_sigpending_tsk(struct task_struct *t)
{
if ((t->jobctl & JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK) ||
PENDING(&t->pending, &t->blocked) ||
PENDING(&t->signal->shared_pending, &t->blocked)) {
set_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_SIGPENDING);
- return 1;
+ return true;
}
+
/*
* We must never clear the flag in another thread, or in current
* when it's possible the current syscall is returning -ERESTART*.
* So we don't clear it here, and only callers who know they should do.
*/
- return 0;
+ return false;
}
/*
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists