[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXC2iuvHnTsnz=6Z_OqeMhiv9aSs372cGpsii021jsZrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 20:39:18 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
dave@...aar.me, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Martin Fuzzey <mfuzzey@...keon.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Broeking <nbroeking@...com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, duwe@...e.de,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] efi/firmware/platform-x86: Add EFI embedded fw support
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:53 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Here is v6 of my patch-set to add support for EFI embedded fw to the kernel.
>
> This patch-set applies on top of the "[PATCH v7 00/14] firmware_loader
> changes for v4.18" series from mcgrof.
>
> It now also depends on the series from Andy Lutomirski which allow using the
> sha256 code in a standalone manner. Andy what is the status of those?
They're currently sort of on hold, since Jason Donenfeld is working on
a more comprehensive solution to the same problem. Jason, I don't
suppose the sha256 part of your patch set is ready?
Ard, if Jason's patches are too far in the future, would you be okay
with merging a cleaned-up version of my patch for sha256 even if the
sha512 equivalent isn't there?
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists