[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <152792062103.225090.8616356640432786461@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:23:41 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] clk: ingenic: Support specifying "wait for clock stable"
delay
Quoting Paul Cercueil (2018-05-20 09:31:13)
> Some clocks need a small delay after being ungated to run stable, as
> using them too soon might result in hardware lockups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists