[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gWeq034sObmHsbJoiBri4a=Av8xroeuW+eqyv_W=cHjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 10:05:26 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@...omium.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, chenhong3@...wei.com,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, ravisadineni@...gle.com,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
tbroch@...gle.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>, bleung@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: Print wakeup_count instead of event_count in the
sysfs attribute.
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 4:32 AM, Ravi Chandra Sadineni
<ravisadineni@...omium.org> wrote:
> Currently we show event_count instead of wakeup_count as part of per
> device wakeup_count sysfs attribute. Change it to wakeup_count to make
> it more meaningful.
More information, please.
In particular, why it is more meaningful.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists