linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] bitmap: Add bitmap_alloc(), bitmap_zalloc() and bitmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180604215723.GH164893@dtor-ws>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2018 14:57:23 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] bitmap: Add bitmap_alloc(), bitmap_zalloc() and
 bitmap_free()

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 12:59:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 11:33 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> > 
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 11:31:18AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > A lot of code become ugly because of open coding allocations for
> > > bitmaps.
> > > 
> > > Introduce three helpers to allow users be more clear of intention
> > > and keep their code neat.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > This looks nice and I like how it simplifies drivers.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> >  How do we merge
> > this? 
> 
> I suppose through 'input' tree if there is no objections.

OK, let's wait for objections for a few days.

> 
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/bitmap.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/bitmap.h b/include/linux/bitmap.h
> > > index 1ee46f492267..845822425393 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/bitmap.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/bitmap.h
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > >  
> > >  #include <linux/types.h>
> > >  #include <linux/bitops.h>
> > > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > >  #include <linux/string.h>
> > >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > >  
> > > @@ -104,6 +105,21 @@
> > >   * contain all bit positions from 0 to 'bits' - 1.
> > >   */
> > >  
> > > +static inline unsigned long *bitmap_alloc(unsigned int nbits, gfp_t
> > > flags)
> > > +{
> > > +	return kmalloc_array(BITS_TO_LONGS(nbits), sizeof(unsigned
> > > long), flags);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline unsigned long *bitmap_zalloc(unsigned int nbits,
> > > gfp_t flags)
> > > +{
> > > +	return kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(nbits), sizeof(unsigned long),
> > > flags);
> > 
> > 	retrun bitmap_alloc(nbits, flags | __GFP_ZERO);
> > 
> > ?
> 
> I though about this, but decide not to rely on linux/gfp.h.
> If you think explicit __GFP_ZERO is better, I can replace in v2, or if

I like it ;) and we already do it for kcalloc done via kmalloc_array
with __GFP_ZERO or kzalloc (kmalloc with __GFP_ZERO).

> you have a chance to do that when applying it would be appreciated.

Yeah, I can do that, no problem.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry