linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] dm: remove DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED dm_queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:24:16 -0600
From:   Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc:     Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.orgw
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] dm: remove DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED dm_queue_mode

On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 06:04:43PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, May 29 2018 at  3:51pm -0400,
> Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > The DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED dm_queue_mode was introduced to prevent DM
> > devices that could possibly support DAX from transitioning into DM devices
> > that cannot support DAX.
> > 
> > For example, the following transition will currently fail:
> > 
> >  dm-linear: [fsdax pmem][fsdax pmem] => [fsdax pmem][fsdax raw]
> > 	      DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED       DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED
> > 
> > but these will both succeed:
> > 
> >  dm-linear: [fsdax pmem][brd ramdisk] => [fsdax pmem][fsdax raw]
> >  	      DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED        DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED
> > 
> 
> I fail to see how this succeeds given
> drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c:is_valid_type() only allows transitions from:
> 
> DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED => DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED

Right, sorry, that was a typo.  What I meant was:

> For example, the following transition will currently fail:
> 
>  dm-linear: [fsdax pmem][fsdax pmem] => [fsdax pmem][fsdax raw]
>               DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED       DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED
> 
> but these will both succeed:
> 
>  dm-linear: [fsdax pmem][brd ramdisk] => [fsdax pmem][fsdax raw]
>                 DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED        DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED
> 
>  dm-linear: [fsdax pmem][fsdax raw] => [fsdax pmem][fsdax pmem]
>                 DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED        DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED

So we allow 2 of the 3 transitions, but the reason that we disallow the third
isn't fully clear to me.

> >  dm-linear: [fsdax pmem][fsdax raw] => [fsdax pmem][fsdax pmem]
> >  		DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED        DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED
> > 
> > This seems arbitrary, as really the choice on whether to use DAX happens at
> > filesystem mount time.  There's no guarantee that the in the first case
> > (double fsdax pmem) we were using the dax mount option with our file
> > system.
> > 
> > Instead, get rid of DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED and all the special casing around
> > it, and instead make the request queue's QUEUE_FLAG_DAX be our one source
> > of truth.  If this is set, we can use DAX, and if not, not.  We keep this
> > up to date in table_load() as the table changes.  As with regular block
> > devices the filesystem will then know at mount time whether DAX is a
> > supported mount option or not.
> 
> If you don't think you need this specialization that is fine.. but DM
> devices supporting suspending (as part of table reloads) so is there any
> risk that there will be inflight IO (say if someone did 'dmsetup suspend
> --noflush').. and then upon reload the device type changed out from
> under us.. anyway, I don't have all the PMEM DAX stuff paged back into
> my head yet.
> 
> But this just seems like we really shouldn't be allowing the
> transition from what was DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED back to DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED

I admit I don't fully understand all the ways that DM supports suspending and
resuming devices.  Is there actually a case where we can change out the DM
devices while I/O is running, and somehow end up trying to issue a DAX I/O to
a device that doesn't support DAX?

Toshi, do you have a test case that shows this somehow?