linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] dm: remove DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED dm_queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2018 23:49:18 +0000
From:   "Kani, Toshi" <toshi.kani@....com>
To:     "ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
        "snitzer@...hat.com" <snitzer@...hat.com>
CC:     "dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        "linux-xfs@...r.kernel.orgw" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.orgw>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] dm: remove DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED dm_queue_mode

On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 17:24 -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 06:04:43PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29 2018 at  3:51pm -0400,
> > Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
 :
> > For example, the following transition will currently fail:
> > 
> >  dm-linear: [fsdax pmem][fsdax pmem] => [fsdax pmem][fsdax raw]
> >               DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED       DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED
> > 
> > but these will both succeed:
> > 
> >  dm-linear: [fsdax pmem][brd ramdisk] => [fsdax pmem][fsdax raw]
> >                 DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED        DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED
> > 
> >  dm-linear: [fsdax pmem][fsdax raw] => [fsdax pmem][fsdax pmem]
> >                 DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED        DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED
> 
> So we allow 2 of the 3 transitions, but the reason that we disallow the third
> isn't fully clear to me.

I need to refresh my memory for the code, but here is the intent.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/22/1000
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/22/999


> > >  dm-linear: [fsdax pmem][fsdax raw] => [fsdax pmem][fsdax pmem]
> > >  		DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED        DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED
> > > 
> > > This seems arbitrary, as really the choice on whether to use DAX happens at
> > > filesystem mount time.  There's no guarantee that the in the first case
> > > (double fsdax pmem) we were using the dax mount option with our file
> > > system.
> > > 
> > > Instead, get rid of DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED and all the special casing around
> > > it, and instead make the request queue's QUEUE_FLAG_DAX be our one source
> > > of truth.  If this is set, we can use DAX, and if not, not.  We keep this
> > > up to date in table_load() as the table changes.  As with regular block
> > > devices the filesystem will then know at mount time whether DAX is a
> > > supported mount option or not.
> > 
> > If you don't think you need this specialization that is fine.. but DM
> > devices supporting suspending (as part of table reloads) so is there any
> > risk that there will be inflight IO (say if someone did 'dmsetup suspend
> > --noflush').. and then upon reload the device type changed out from
> > under us.. anyway, I don't have all the PMEM DAX stuff paged back into
> > my head yet.
> > 
> > But this just seems like we really shouldn't be allowing the
> > transition from what was DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED back to DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED
> 
> I admit I don't fully understand all the ways that DM supports suspending and
> resuming devices.  Is there actually a case where we can change out the DM
> devices while I/O is running, and somehow end up trying to issue a DAX I/O to
> a device that doesn't support DAX?
> 
> Toshi, do you have a test case that shows this somehow?

No, I did not test suspend/resume since HPE servers do not support it.

Thanks,
-Toshi