[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d20be40-4c15-4e15-a4d0-cd2efda6d701@default>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 08:16:51 +0000 (UTC)
From: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
To: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <mingo@...hat.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Srinivas REDDY Eeda <srinivas.eeda@...cle.com>,
<bp@...en8.de>, <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Ensure new microcode processor flags
match with cpu's pf
Intel spec says: 'The processor flags in the 48-byte header and the
processor flags field associated with the extended processor signature
structures may have multiple bits set.'
Make sure processor flags of the new microcode intersect with current
cpu's. Comparing with old microcode's pf can't guarantee this.
Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 8 +++-----
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 461e315..54f4014 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -371,12 +371,10 @@ static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err)
goto next;
} else {
- struct microcode_header_intel *phdr = &patch->hdr;
-
if (!has_newer_microcode(data,
- phdr->sig,
- phdr->pf,
- phdr->rev))
+ uci->cpu_sig.sig,
+ uci->cpu_sig.pf,
+ patch->hdr.rev))
goto next;
}
--
1.7.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists