[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a28154deb468669a59c120a90d4aedc1e1e705b.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 19:04:14 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Abhishek Goel <huntbag@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpuidle/powernv : Add Description for cpuidle state
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 13:47 +0530, Abhishek Goel wrote:
> + if (of_property_read_string_array(power_mgt,
> + "ibm,cpu-idle-state-descs", descs, dt_idle_states) < 0) {
> + of_property_read_string_array(power_mgt,
> + "ibm,cpu-idle-state-names", descs, dt_idle_states);
> + pr_warn("cpuidle-powernv: missing ibm,cpu-idle-state-descs in DT\n"
> + "Name will be used for description\n");
> + }
>
> /*
Is this a new property ? I'm not fan of adding yet another of those
silly arrays.
I would say this is the right time now to switch over to a node per
state instead, as we discussed with Vaidy.
Additionally, while doing that, we can provide the versioning mechanism
I proposed so we can deal with state specific issues and erratas.
Cheers,
Ben.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists