linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: imx6qdl: add missing compatible and clock properties for EPIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:10:28 +0200
From:   Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
To:     Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
Cc:     Colin Didier <colin.didier@...ialet.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Clément Peron <clement.peron@...ialet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: imx6qdl: add missing compatible and
 clock properties for EPIT

Hi Vladimir,

On Thu, 31 May 2018 at 10:54, Vladimir Zapolskiy
<vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Clément,
>
> On 05/31/2018 11:41 AM, Clément Péron wrote:
> > Hi Vladimir,
> >
> > On Thu, 31 May 2018 at 10:33, Vladimir Zapolskiy
> > <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 05/30/2018 03:03 PM, Clément Péron wrote:
> >>> From: Colin Didier <colin.didier@...ialet.com>
> >>>
> >>> Add missing compatible and clock properties for EPIT node.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Colin Didier <colin.didier@...ialet.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Clément Peron <clement.peron@...ialet.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
> >>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
> >>> index c003e62bf290..0feec516847a 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
> >>> @@ -844,13 +844,23 @@
> >>>                       };
> >>>
> >>>                       epit1: epit@...0000 { /* EPIT1 */
> >>
> >> epit1: timer@...0000 { ...
> >>
> >> And /* EPIT1 */ comment can be removed, it is quite clear from the same
> >> line context.
> >>
> >> Formally it is a subject to another patch, but I think this can be
> >> accepted as a part of this one.
> >
> > Should I also update other boards ?
> > I only did it for imx6qdl.dtsi, but the EPIT is present in other boards
> > but i can't test it myself.
> >
>
> Sure, please do it, why not, it is quite a safe modification.
>
> One change per one dtsi file will suffice, and I see that imx25.dtsi
> already contains the requested change, however probably you may
> want to update its compatible = "fsl,imx25-epit" line.
>
> Regarding compatibles for other imx6* SoCs, I think all of them should
> be documented in fsl,imxepit.txt and then added to the correspondent
> dtsi files one per SoC.

Nvidia UART doc did this :
        - For other Tegra, must contain '"nvidia,<chip>-uart",
          "nvidia,tegra20-uart"' where <chip> is tegra30, tegra114, tegra124,

I will follow this.

>
> And I forgot the outcome of one former discussion with Uwe Kleine-König,
> but if my bad memory serves me, we agreed that i.MX25 was released later
> than i.MX31, so the most generic (the last value in the list) compatible
> should be a compatible with i.MX31 like in
>
>         imx25.dtsi:367: compatible = "fsl,imx25-gpt", "fsl,imx31-gpt";
>
> --
> With best wishes,
> Vladimir

Regards,
Clement