linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the regulator tree with the arm-soc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:46:42 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the regulator tree with the arm-soc
 tree

On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 12:49:53AM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:

> I confirm the fix by Stephen works for me, however, the conflicting patch by 
> Linus breaks things a bit.

> Lookup tables added to board files use function name "enable" while the 
> regulator uses NULL. As a result, GPIO descriptor is not matched and not 
> assigned to the regulator which ends up running with no control over GPIO pin.

> Either the regulator driver should use the function name "enable" or that name 
> should be removed from lookup tables.

I'll revert this one as well :(

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)