linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/29] 4.9.106-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180604122124.GA2738@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2018 14:21:24 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/29] 4.9.106-stable review

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 01:27:06PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 03:15:23AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 06/03/2018 11:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.106 release.
> > > There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Wed Jun  6 06:57:52 UTC 2018.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > 
> > Are you testing us ?
> > 
> > Building x86_64:tools/perf ... failed
> > --------------
> > Error log:
> > make[4]: execvp: ./check-headers.sh: Permission denied
> > make[4]: *** [sub-make] Error 127
> 
> Heh, no, I wasn't, but thanks for checking.
> 
> > Something went wrong with the patch creating the file. In the original
> > commit it is created as 755, in the backport it is created as 644.
> 
> Ugh, quilt does not keep the permissions of files :(
> 
> I thought I had figured that out in the past, let me try to go remember
> what I did before...
> 
> There's also a .sh file in the objtool directory that is not the proper
> permissions as well...

Ok, hand editing patch files are always so much fun...  Anyway, this is
fixed up now in the -rc1 git tree I pushed out again.  Let me know if
that fails.

And thanks for testing the build of perf now :)

thanks,

greg k-h