[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180604132736.zay3ae5we6d7adsk@rfolt0960.corp.atmel.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:27:36 +0200
From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...ntech.at>
CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: atmel-isi: drop unnecessary while loop
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 12:46:14PM +0000, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> From: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
>
> As there is no way this can loop it actually makes no sense to have
> a while(1){} around the body - all three possible paths end in a return
> statement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
> Fixes: commit c1d82b895380 "[media] atmel-isi: move out of soc_camera to atmel"
Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Thanks.
> ---
>
> The diff output is unfortunately not that readable - essentially only
> the outer while(1){ } was removed.
>
> Patch was compile tested with: x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_MEDIA_SUPPORT=y
> MEDIA_CAMERA_SUPPORT=y, CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER=y, V4L_PLATFORM_DRIVERS=y
> OF=y, CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST=y, CONFIG_VIDEO_ATMEL_ISI=y
>
> Compile testing atmel-isi.c shows some sparse warnings. Seems to be due to
> sizeof operator being applied to a union (not related to the function being
> changed though).
>
> Patch is against 4.17-rc7 (localversion-next is next-20180531)
>
> drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isi.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isi.c b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isi.c
> index e5be21a..85fc7b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isi.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isi.c
> @@ -1106,23 +1106,21 @@ static int isi_graph_parse(struct atmel_isi *isi, struct device_node *node)
> struct device_node *ep = NULL;
> struct device_node *remote;
>
> - while (1) {
> - ep = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(node, ep);
> - if (!ep)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - remote = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep);
> - if (!remote) {
> - of_node_put(ep);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + ep = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(node, ep);
> + if (!ep)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> - /* Remote node to connect */
> - isi->entity.node = remote;
> - isi->entity.asd.match_type = V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE;
> - isi->entity.asd.match.fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(remote);
> - return 0;
> + remote = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep);
> + if (!remote) {
> + of_node_put(ep);
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> +
> + /* Remote node to connect */
> + isi->entity.node = remote;
> + isi->entity.asd.match_type = V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE;
> + isi->entity.asd.match.fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(remote);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int isi_graph_init(struct atmel_isi *isi)
> --
> 2.1.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists