linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 3/5] arm64: pgtable: Add p*d_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28cc339e-b184-5f15-eca3-cf54e9376e01@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2018 19:13:48 +0530
From:   Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     catalin.marinas@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, toshi.kani@....com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/5] arm64: pgtable: Add p*d_page_vaddr helper macros



On 6/4/2018 5:43 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 06:09:16PM +0530, Chintan Pandya wrote:
>> Add helper macros to give virtual references to page
>> tables. These will be used while freeing dangling
>> page tables.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index 7c4c8f3..ef4047f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -580,6 +580,9 @@ static inline phys_addr_t pgd_page_paddr(pgd_t pgd)
>>   
>>   #endif  /* CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 3 */
>>   
>> +#define pmd_page_vaddr(pmd) __va(pmd_page_paddr(pmd))
>> +#define pud_page_vaddr(pud) __va(pud_page_paddr(pud))
> 
> Are these actually needed, or do pte_offset_kernel and pmd_offset do the
> job already?
> 

I introduced these macros for consistency across different arch.

Looking at pte_offset_kernel, it seems to use READ_ONCE() which looks
little costly for its intended use (in next patch) where we already have
dereferenced value. Do you still suggest to remove this ?

> Will
> 

Chintan
-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project