[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180604041812.GB8977@zurbaran.ger.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 06:18:12 +0200
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFC: fdp: fix signed less or equal zero check in u8
max_size
Hi Colin,
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 03:33:59PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The u8 variable max_size is being assigned a return value from the
> call to nci_conn_max_data_pkt_payload_size that can return a -ve
> error return. Since max_size is a u8, the -ve check for the error will
> always be false. Fix this by making max_size an int type.
>
> Detected using Coccinelle:
> drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c:208:5-13: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared
> with zero: max_size <= 0
>
> Fixes: a06347c04c13 ("NFC: Add Intel Fields Peak NFC solution driver")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied to nfc-next, thanks.
Cheers,
Samuel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists