linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V1 3/3] scsi: ufs: Add sysfs support for ufs provision

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2018 08:41:27 -0700
From:   Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
To:     sayalil@...eaurora.org
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, stanislav.nijnikov@....com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, subhashj@...eaurora.org,
        cang@...eaurora.org, vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
        jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        asutoshd@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 3/3] scsi: ufs: Add sysfs support for ufs provision

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:49 AM sayali <sayalil@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Evan,
>
> I am working on upstreaming runtime UFS provisioning patches and have posted
> my latest (V1) patches for review.
> I have noticed that you are also working on the same and would appreciate if
> you could also review my patches.
> I believe it will save us all some time and duplicate effort. Let me know if
> you have any concern or comments on this.
>
> Thanks,
> Sayali
>

Hi Sayali,
I am currently travelling for work, but will make an effort to review
your patches soon. It looks like we did a bit of duplicate work. Maybe
the maintainers or community at large could let us know which approach
they prefer, or if they want both.
-Evan