[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <152812780433.10068.4191004481518140821.stgit@devbox>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 00:56:44 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH -tip v5 17/27] arm64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in arm kprobes code
Don't call the ->break_handler() from the arm kprobes code,
because it was only used by jprobes which got removed.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
---
arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
index 3ca2351109a6..076c3c0775a6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
@@ -408,14 +408,6 @@ static void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
return;
}
}
- } else if ((le32_to_cpu(*(kprobe_opcode_t *) addr) ==
- BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES) && cur_kprobe) {
- /* We probably hit a jprobe. Call its break handler. */
- if (cur_kprobe->break_handler &&
- cur_kprobe->break_handler(cur_kprobe, regs)) {
- setup_singlestep(cur_kprobe, regs, kcb, 0);
- return;
- }
}
/*
* The breakpoint instruction was removed right
Powered by blists - more mailing lists