[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3c9a486-002e-a63b-7d2d-2b51ce55b08f@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 18:23:59 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] mfd: da9063: Use REGMAP_IRQ_REG
On 06/04/2018 02:26 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
>> Convert the regmap_irq table to use REGMAP_IRQ_REG().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>
>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
>> ---
>> V3: New patch
>> Note: A sed oneliner was used:
>> sed -i "/\[DA9063_IRQ_/ {N;N;N;s/\n//g;s/.*\[\(DA9063_IRQ_[^]]\+\)].*reg_offset = \([^,]\+\),.* = \([^,]\+\),.*/\tREGMAP_IRQ_REG(\1, \2, \3),/}" drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c | 145 ++++++++++-------------------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
>> index 207bbfe55449..5b406ecfc14a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
>> @@ -28,125 +28,38 @@
>>
>> static const struct regmap_irq da9063_irqs[] = {
>> /* DA9063 event A register */
>> - [DA9063_IRQ_ONKEY] = {
>> - .reg_offset = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET,
>> - .mask = DA9063_M_ONKEY,
>> - },
>> - [DA9063_IRQ_ALARM] = {
>> - .reg_offset = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET,
>> - .mask = DA9063_M_ALARM,
>> - },
>> - [DA9063_IRQ_TICK] = {
>> - .reg_offset = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET,
>> - .mask = DA9063_M_TICK,
>> - },
>> - [DA9063_IRQ_ADC_RDY] = {
>> - .reg_offset = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET,
>> - .mask = DA9063_M_ADC_RDY,
>> - },
>> - [DA9063_IRQ_SEQ_RDY] = {
>> - .reg_offset = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET,
>> - .mask = DA9063_M_SEQ_RDY,
>> - },
>> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_ONKEY, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_ONKEY),
>> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_ALARM, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_ALARM),
>> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_TICK, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_TICK),
>> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_ADC_RDY, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_ADC_RDY),
>> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_SEQ_RDY, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_SEQ_RDY),
>
> Nice, but I think checkpatch.pl would complain.
>
> Better to break after the first argument I think.
Doesn't really help the readability, but done.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
Powered by blists - more mailing lists