[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1528136558.7898.115.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 14:22:38 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/19] mm/migrate: Use xchg instead of spinlock
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 15:30 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -1874,11 +1874,9 @@ static bool
> numamigrate_update_ratelimit(pg_data_t *pgdat,
> * all the time is being spent migrating!
> */
> if (time_after(jiffies, pgdat-
> >numabalancing_migrate_next_window)) {
> - spin_lock(&pgdat->numabalancing_migrate_lock);
> - pgdat->numabalancing_migrate_nr_pages = 0;
> - pgdat->numabalancing_migrate_next_window = jiffies +
> - msecs_to_jiffies(migrate_interval_millisecs)
> ;
> - spin_unlock(&pgdat->numabalancing_migrate_lock);
> + if (xchg(&pgdat->numabalancing_migrate_nr_pages, 0))
> + pgdat->numabalancing_migrate_next_window =
> jiffies +
> + msecs_to_jiffies(migrate_interval_mi
> llisecs);
> }
I am not convinced this is simpler, but no real
objection either way :)
--
All Rights Reversed.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists