[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180604120702.ef69c28585fe925f9a55e130@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 12:07:02 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: vdavydov.dev@...il.com, shakeelb@...gle.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, pombredanne@...b.com, stummala@...eaurora.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, guro@...com,
mka@...omium.org, penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp,
chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, longman@...hat.com, minchan@...nel.org,
ying.huang@...el.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net, jbacik@...com,
linux@...ck-us.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, willy@...radead.org, lirongqing@...du.com,
aryabinin@...tuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/17] Improve shrink_slab() scalability (old
complexity was O(n^2), new is O(n))
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:45:17 +0300 Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
> Hi, Andrew!
>
> This patchset is reviewed by Vladimir Davydov. I see, there is
> minor change in current linux-next.git, which makes the second
> patch to apply not completely clean.
>
> Could you tell what should I do with this? Is this OK or should
> I rebase it on top of linux.next or do something else?
A resend against 4.18-rc1 would be ideal, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists