[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180604201637.GB9960@builder>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 13:16:37 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: switch to dma_XX barriers for rpmsg
On Thu 19 Apr 10:48 PDT 2018, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 19/04/2018 19:46, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> This should be okay, but I wonder if there should be a virtio_wmb(...)
> >> or an "if (weak_barriers) wmb()" before the "writel" in vm_notify
> >> (drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c).
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Paolo
> > That one uses weak barriers AFAIK.
> >
> > IIUC you mean rproc_virtio_notify.
> >
> > I suspect it works because specific kick callbacks have a barrier internally.
>
> Yes, that one. At least keystone_rproc_kick doesn't seem to have a barrier.
>
Afaict you're correct. My expectation is that the kick ensures write
ordering internally and if I read this correct keystone_rproc_kick()
results in a writel_relaxed() in the gpio driver.
@Suman, can you please have a look at this.
Thanks Paolo,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists