| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB701941AD6EC@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 19:52:25 +0000
From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 07/10] mfd: da9063: Add custom IRQ map for DA9063L
Hi Marek,
Thanks.
On 02 June 2018 11:12, Marek Vasut wrote,
> Subject: [PATCH v3 07/10] mfd: da9063: Add custom IRQ map for DA9063L
>
> While the datasheet for DA9063L (2v1, 23-Mar-2017) lists the RTC register
> block, the DA9063L does not have an RTC. Add custom IRQ map for DA9063L to
> ignore the Alarm and Tick IRQs from the PMIC.
I've added a request to remove the RTC references from the DA9063L datasheet.
Adding that first part to the sentence in the commit log: "While the datasheet for DA9063L
(2v1, 23-Mar-2017) lists the RTC register block" is just pointing out an ambiguity from the
datasheet since the it also identifies those registers in Table 102 on page 126 as
"Reserved".
I would like to suggest, the commit log entry: "Add custom IRQ map for DA9063L to ignore
the Alarm and Tick IRQs from the PMIC".
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> Cc: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> V3: New patch
> ---
> drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c | 55
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
> index 5b406ecfc14a..b6a88861cc2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
> @@ -74,8 +74,55 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip da9063_irq_chip = {
> .init_ack_masked = true,
> };
>
> +static const struct regmap_irq da9063l_irqs[] = {
> + /* DA9063 event A register */
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_ONKEY,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_ONKEY),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_ADC_RDY,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_ADC_RDY),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_SEQ_RDY,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_SEQ_RDY),
> + /* DA9063 event B register */
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_WAKE,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_WAKE),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_TEMP,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_TEMP),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_COMP_1V2,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_COMP_1V2),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_LDO_LIM,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_LDO_LIM),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_REG_UVOV,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_UVOV),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_DVC_RDY,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_DVC_RDY),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_VDD_MON,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_VDD_MON),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_WARN,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_VDD_WARN),
> + /* DA9063 event C register */
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI0, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET,
> DA9063_M_GPI0),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI1, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET,
> DA9063_M_GPI1),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI2, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET,
> DA9063_M_GPI2),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI3, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET,
> DA9063_M_GPI3),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI4, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET,
> DA9063_M_GPI4),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI5, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET,
> DA9063_M_GPI5),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI6, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET,
> DA9063_M_GPI6),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI7, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET,
> DA9063_M_GPI7),
> + /* DA9063 event D register */
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI8, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET,
> DA9063_M_GPI8),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI9, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET,
> DA9063_M_GPI9),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI10,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI10),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI11,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI11),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI12,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI12),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI13,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI13),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI14,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI14),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI15,
> DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI15),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_irq_chip da9063l_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "da9063l-irq",
> + .irqs = da9063l_irqs,
> + .num_irqs = DA9063_NUM_IRQ,
Isn't the number of IRQs in the DA9063L different to the standard DA9063
because of the missing RTC?
Regards,
Steve
> +
> + .num_regs = 4,
> + .status_base = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A,
> + .mask_base = DA9063_REG_IRQ_MASK_A,
> + .ack_base = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A,
> + .init_ack_masked = true,
> +};
> +
> int da9063_irq_init(struct da9063 *da9063)
> {
> + struct regmap_irq_chip *irq_chip;
> int ret;
>
> if (!da9063->chip_irq) {
> @@ -83,10 +130,14 @@ int da9063_irq_init(struct da9063 *da9063)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (da9063->type == PMIC_TYPE_DA9063)
> + irq_chip = &da9063_irq_chip;
> + else
> + irq_chip = &da9063l_irq_chip;
> +
> ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(da9063->regmap, da9063->chip_irq,
> IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
> - da9063->irq_base, &da9063_irq_chip,
> - &da9063->regmap_irq);
> + da9063->irq_base, irq_chip, &da9063->regmap_irq);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(da9063->dev, "Failed to reguest IRQ %d: %d\n",
> da9063->chip_irq, ret);
> --
> 2.16.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists