linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3]: perf record: enable arbitrary event names thru name= modifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Jun 2018 09:00:17 +0300
From:   Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3]: perf record: enable arbitrary event names thru name=
 modifier

Hi,
On 04.06.2018 22:16, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 06:22:43PM +0300, Alexey Budankov escreveu:
>> On 04.06.2018 17:58, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Em Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 05:51:03PM +0300, Alexey Budankov escreveu:
>>>> event names quoted there. If such cases were pointed out then they also 
>>>> could be addressed along with the unit/regression testing mentioned above.
> 
>>> So lests stick to just the unit/regression testing, can you take a look
>>> at that?
>  
>> Sure. Is it enough to run perf record with some quoted event name to make 
>> sure it runs successfully?
> 
> I mentioned tools/perf/tests/attr/, for checking if the perf_event_attr
> was setup the way you intended, and tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c,
> which probably is what we want here, see, for instance, this cset I've
> added recently to have we testing intel_pt event parsing:
> 
> $ git show b3f58c8da64bc63bd0c0a06a4e2cf258a3d20be6
> commit b3f58c8da64bc63bd0c0a06a4e2cf258a3d20be6
> Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> Date:   Fri May 11 11:48:54 2018 -0300
> 
>     perf tests parse-events: Add intel_pt parse test
>     
>     To avoid regressions such as the one fixed by 4a35a9027f64 ("Revert
>     "perf pmu: Fix pmu events parsing rule""), where '-e intel_pt//u' got
>     broken, with this new entry in this 'perf tests' subtest, we would have
>     caught it before pushing upstream.
>     
>     Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
>     Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
>     Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
>     Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>     Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
>     Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
>     Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>     Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
>     Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>     Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
>     Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-kw62fys9bwdgsp722so2ln1l@git.kernel.org
>     Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
> index 18b06444f230..6829dd416a99 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c
> @@ -1309,6 +1309,14 @@ static int test__checkevent_config_cache(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int test__intel_pt(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
> +{
> +	struct perf_evsel *evsel = perf_evlist__first(evlist);
> +
> +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong name setting", strcmp(evsel->name, "intel_pt//u") == 0);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int count_tracepoints(void)
>  {
>  	struct dirent *events_ent;
> @@ -1637,6 +1645,11 @@ static struct evlist_test test__events[] = {
>  		.check = test__checkevent_config_cache,
>  		.id    = 51,
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.name  = "intel_pt//u",
> +		.check = test__intel_pt,
> +		.id    = 52,
> +	},
>  };
>  
>  static struct evlist_test test__events_pmu[] = {
> 
> See also this one:
> 
> static int
> test__checkevent_breakpoint_len_rw_modifier(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
> {
>         struct perf_evsel *evsel = perf_evlist__first(evlist);
> 
>         TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_user", !evsel->attr.exclude_user);
>         TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_kernel", evsel->attr.exclude_kernel);
>         TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_hv", evsel->attr.exclude_hv);
>         TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong precise_ip", !evsel->attr.precise_ip);
> 
>         return test__checkevent_breakpoint_rw(evlist);
> }
>         {
>                 .name  = "mem:0/4:rw:u",
>                 .check = test__checkevent_breakpoint_len_rw_modifier,
>                 .id    = 44
>         },
> 
> 
> I.e. have as many TEST_ASSERT_VAL as you need, checking how parsing the
> event name ends up setting up the evsel, evlist and perf_event_attr.

Ok, I see. But please expect delay in delivery since I am on vacations till 06/18.

Thanks,
Alexey

> 
> - Arnaldo
>