[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1528234513.3557.16.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 17:35:13 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Jeff Vander Stoep <jeffv@...gle.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4a 8/8] module: replace the existing LSM hook in
init_module
On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 12:45 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> And if you must have a separate enum, please change this to fail
> closed instead of open (and mark the fall-through):
>
> int rc = -EPERM;
>
> switch (id) {
> case LOADING_MODULE:
> rc = loadpin_read_file(NULL, READING_MODULE);
> /* Fall-through */
> default:
> break;
> }
This will fail the sysfs firmware fallback loading and the kexec_load
syscall without any message, as you have for init_module. Is that
what you want?
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists