[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxz46_efiQw9Nk_pFbX3AYx+oehPQOk-BDd1Xpbr2Oa3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 16:04:37 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: x86/asm: __clear_user() micro-optimization (was: "Re: [GIT PULL]
x86/asm changes for v4.18")
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:01 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:41 PM Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On my potato performance increase is 33%, sheesh.
> > And CPU starts doing 3 instructions per cycle vs 2.
>
> Whee. That's a shockingly big difference. On my CPU (i7-6700K) it
> makes absolutely no difference whether the values are integers or in
> registers.
In fact, looking at Agner Fog's instruction lists, I don't see any CPU
where it would make a difference, except for the P4 (where the
immediate looks like it's a bad idea because it's an extra uop, but it
might pack fine and not be noticeable).
But maybe I'm missing something subtle. What CPU, out of morbid interest?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists