[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d29a3c2-056c-3a70-3ecf-56cdf6e37931@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:53:36 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, edubezval@...il.com, kevin.wangtao@...aro.org,
leo.yan@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, javi.merino@...nel.org,
rui.zhang@...el.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
daniel.thompson@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] powercap/drivers/idle_injection: Add an idle injection
framework
On 05/06/2018 07:53, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 05-06-18, 07:48, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> As soon as we reach complete(), no timer can be set because of the
>> condition before.
>
> Why not ? We aren't using any locks here and it is possible that run_duration_ms
> is set to 0 from idle_injection_stop() only after the first thread has restarted
> the hrtimer. Isn't it ?
If he restarted the timer, complete() won't be called and
idle_injection_stop() will wait until the idle cycle injection is finished.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists