linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] ocxl: Fix missing unlock on error in afu_ioctl_enable_p9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <eb4f541f-cd2a-2af6-0770-fc8cc4f4063b@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jun 2018 14:57:00 +0200
From:   Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
        Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Alastair D'Silva" <alastair@...ilva.org>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ocxl: Fix missing unlock on error in
 afu_ioctl_enable_p9_wait()



Le 05/06/2018 à 11:16, Wei Yongjun a écrit :
> Add the missing unlock before return from function
> afu_ioctl_enable_p9_wait() in the error handling case.
> 
> Fixes: e948e06fc63a ("ocxl: Expose the thread_id needed for wait on POWER9")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
> ---
>   drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
> index 33ae46c..e6a6074 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
> @@ -139,8 +139,10 @@ static long afu_ioctl_enable_p9_wait(struct ocxl_context *ctx,
>   		// Locks both status & tidr
>   		mutex_lock(&ctx->status_mutex);
>   		if (!ctx->tidr) {
> -			if (set_thread_tidr(current))
> +			if (set_thread_tidr(current)) {
> +				mutex_unlock(&ctx->status_mutex);
>   				return -ENOENT;
> +			}

O_o   Thanks for fixing it

Acked-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>


>   			ctx->tidr = current->thread.tidr;
>   		}
>