[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180605.090039.1115878490025405476.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 09:00:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hch@....de
Cc: andy.shevchenko@...il.com, yuehaibing@...wei.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jcliburn@...il.com, chris.snook@...il.com, benve@...co.com,
jdmason@...zu.us, chessman@....org, jes@...ined-monkey.org,
rahul.verma@...ium.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] use pci_zalloc_consistent
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 14:49:29 +0200
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 03:39:16PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:28 PM, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> wrote:
>> >
>>
>> Hmm... Is PCI case anyhow special or it's a simple wrapper on top of
>> dma.*alloc() ?
>
> All drivers should move from pci_dma* to dma_* eventually. Converting
> from one flavor of deprecated to another is completely pointless.
Agreed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists