[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gqQNHCuaeduQ8oQtGNUQcZxK171nDfyMNi1VVfnVsMqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 17:00:33 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI / PPTT: fix build when CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT is
not enabled
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
> Though CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT is selected by platforms and nor user visible,
> it may be useful to support the build with CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT disabled.
>
> This patch adds the missing dummy/boiler plate implementation to fix
> the build.
>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> ---
> include/linux/acpi.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> include/linux/cacheinfo.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> If you are fine with this, can you provide Ack, so that we route this
> through ARM64 tree where most of the ACPI PPTT support is present.
>
> Regards,
> Sudeep
>
> v1->v2:
> - removed duplicate definition for acpi_find_last_cache_level
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 8f2cdb0eca71..4b35a66383f9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -1299,8 +1299,23 @@ static inline int lpit_read_residency_count_address(u64 *address)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT
> int find_acpi_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level);
> int find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(unsigned int cpu);
> int find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level);
> +#else
> +static inline int find_acpi_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
Why -EINVAL?
> +}
> +static inline int find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +static inline int find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> #endif /*_LINUX_ACPI_H*/
> diff --git a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> index 89397e30e269..70e19bc6cc9f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct cpu_cacheinfo *get_cpu_cacheinfo(unsigned int cpu);
> int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu);
> int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu);
> int cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu);
> -#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT
> /*
> * acpi_find_last_cache_level is only called on ACPI enabled
> * platforms using the PPTT for topology. This means that if
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists