| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20180605170119.187902092@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 19:01:44 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Marc Zyniger <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 23/61] arm64/cpufeature: dont use mutex in bringup path
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
commit 63a1e1c95e60e798fa09ab3c536fb555aa5bbf2b upstream.
Currently, cpus_set_cap() calls static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(), which
must take the jump_label mutex.
We call cpus_set_cap() in the secondary bringup path, from the idle
thread where interrupts are disabled. Taking a mutex in this path "is a
NONO" regardless of whether it's contended, and something we must avoid.
We didn't spot this until recently, as ___might_sleep() won't warn for
this case until all CPUs have been brought up.
This patch avoids taking the mutex in the secondary bringup path. The
poking of static keys is deferred until enable_cpu_capabilities(), which
runs in a suitable context on the boot CPU. To account for the static
keys being set later, cpus_have_const_cap() is updated to use another
static key to check whether the const cap keys have been initialised,
falling back to the caps bitmap until this is the case.
This means that users of cpus_have_const_cap() gain should only gain a
single additional NOP in the fast path once the const caps are
initialised, but should always see the current cap value.
The hyp code should never dereference the caps array, since the caps are
initialized before we run the module initcall to initialise hyp. A check
is added to the hyp init code to document this requirement.
This change will sidestep a number of issues when the upcoming hotplug
locking rework is merged.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyniger <marc.zyngier@....com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
[4.9: this avoids an IPI before GICv3 is up, preventing a boot time crash]
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> [v4.9 backport]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 12 ++++++++++--
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 ++++++--
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ struct arm64_cpu_capabilities {
extern DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
extern struct static_key_false cpu_hwcap_keys[ARM64_NCAPS];
+extern struct static_key_false arm64_const_caps_ready;
bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int cap);
@@ -105,7 +106,7 @@ static inline bool cpu_have_feature(unsi
}
/* System capability check for constant caps */
-static inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
+static inline bool __cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
{
if (num >= ARM64_NCAPS)
return false;
@@ -119,6 +120,14 @@ static inline bool cpus_have_cap(unsigne
return test_bit(num, cpu_hwcaps);
}
+static inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num)
+{
+ if (static_branch_likely(&arm64_const_caps_ready))
+ return __cpus_have_const_cap(num);
+ else
+ return cpus_have_cap(num);
+}
+
static inline void cpus_set_cap(unsigned int num)
{
if (num >= ARM64_NCAPS) {
@@ -126,7 +135,6 @@ static inline void cpus_set_cap(unsigned
num, ARM64_NCAPS);
} else {
__set_bit(num, cpu_hwcaps);
- static_branch_enable(&cpu_hwcap_keys[num]);
}
}
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/kvm_types.h>
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/kvm.h>
#include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
#include <asm/kvm_mmio.h>
@@ -358,9 +359,12 @@ static inline void __cpu_init_hyp_mode(p
unsigned long vector_ptr)
{
/*
- * Call initialization code, and switch to the full blown
- * HYP code.
+ * Call initialization code, and switch to the full blown HYP code.
+ * If the cpucaps haven't been finalized yet, something has gone very
+ * wrong, and hyp will crash and burn when it uses any
+ * cpus_have_const_cap() wrapper.
*/
+ BUG_ON(!static_branch_likely(&arm64_const_caps_ready));
__kvm_call_hyp((void *)pgd_ptr, hyp_stack_ptr, vector_ptr);
}
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1052,8 +1052,16 @@ void update_cpu_capabilities(const struc
*/
void __init enable_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps)
{
- for (; caps->matches; caps++)
- if (caps->enable && cpus_have_cap(caps->capability))
+ for (; caps->matches; caps++) {
+ unsigned int num = caps->capability;
+
+ if (!cpus_have_cap(num))
+ continue;
+
+ /* Ensure cpus_have_const_cap(num) works */
+ static_branch_enable(&cpu_hwcap_keys[num]);
+
+ if (caps->enable) {
/*
* Use stop_machine() as it schedules the work allowing
* us to modify PSTATE, instead of on_each_cpu() which
@@ -1061,6 +1069,8 @@ void __init enable_cpu_capabilities(cons
* we return.
*/
stop_machine(caps->enable, (void *)caps, cpu_online_mask);
+ }
+ }
}
/*
@@ -1164,6 +1174,14 @@ static void __init setup_feature_capabil
enable_cpu_capabilities(arm64_features);
}
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(arm64_const_caps_ready);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm64_const_caps_ready);
+
+static void __init mark_const_caps_ready(void)
+{
+ static_branch_enable(&arm64_const_caps_ready);
+}
+
extern const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[];
bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int cap)
@@ -1180,6 +1198,7 @@ void __init setup_cpu_features(void)
/* Set the CPU feature capabilies */
setup_feature_capabilities();
enable_errata_workarounds();
+ mark_const_caps_ready();
setup_elf_hwcaps(arm64_elf_hwcaps);
if (system_supports_32bit_el0())
Powered by blists - more mailing lists