[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180605170110.588135089@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 19:01:34 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 29/37] stm class: Use vmalloc for the master map
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
commit b5e2ced9bf81393034072dd4d372f6b430bc1f0a upstream.
Fengguang is running into a warning from the buddy allocator:
> swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:9, mode:0x14040c0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null)
> CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.17.0-rc1 #262
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
...
> __kmalloc+0x14b/0x180: ____cache_alloc at mm/slab.c:3127
> stm_register_device+0xf3/0x5c0: stm_register_device at drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c:695
...
Which is basically a result of the stm class trying to allocate ~512kB
for the dummy_stm with its default parameters. There's no reason, however,
for it not to be vmalloc()ed instead, which is what this patch does.
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.4+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static void stm_device_release(struct de
{
struct stm_device *stm = to_stm_device(dev);
- kfree(stm);
+ vfree(stm);
}
int stm_register_device(struct device *parent, struct stm_data *stm_data,
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ int stm_register_device(struct device *p
return -EINVAL;
nmasters = stm_data->sw_end - stm_data->sw_start;
- stm = kzalloc(sizeof(*stm) + nmasters * sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ stm = vzalloc(sizeof(*stm) + nmasters * sizeof(void *));
if (!stm)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ int stm_register_device(struct device *p
err_device:
put_device(&stm->dev);
err_free:
- kfree(stm);
+ vfree(stm);
return err;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists