linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] Input: cros_ec_keyb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180605185216.GG202428@dtor-ws>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jun 2018 11:52:16 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Cc:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] Input: cros_ec_keyb - Switch to SPDX identifier.

On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 08:45:44PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On 05/06/18 20:29, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 03:16:40PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >> Hi Enric,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Enric Balletbo i Serra
> >> <enric.balletbo@...labora.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Right, but the module license is set to GPL which means GNU Public License v2 or
> >>> later, see [1]. So, there is a mismatch. In such cases I assumed GPL-2.0+ as the
> >>> default. These mismatches are common so I think that should be fine for the
> >>> authors, if someone is disagree just let me know and I will change.
> >>
> >> Ok, but I think you should add this explanation in the commit log to
> >> make it clearer.
> > 
> > If there is a conflict between the license notice and MODULE_LICENSE()
> > we should go by the license notice. The license note is usually approved
> > by companies, whereas MIODULE_LICENSE()s get moved, adjusted, etc.
> > 
> > For ChromeOS kernel changes license notice is GPL v2 as documented at:
> > 
> > https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/how-tos-and-troubleshooting/kernel-faq
> > 
> > section "Which copyright header should I use?"
> > 
> 
> Many thanks to share and clarify this.
> 
> There is lots of mismatches so I'll send another version fixing this and
> changing all to GPL v2. I assume I should also modify the MODULE_LICENSE when
> it's wrong.

I'd have a round of changes having MODULE_LICENSE() match the license
notice, and then separate patches for changing over to SPDX tags.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry