[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57f1e61f-49fa-99be-6876-48775272ccec@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:02:08 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 02/17] kallsyms, x86: Export addresses of syscall
trampolines
On 05/06/18 19:00, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> +int arch_get_kallsym(unsigned int symnum, unsigned long *value, char *type,
>> + char *name)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int cpu, ncpu;
>> +
>> + if (symnum >= num_possible_cpus())
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + for (cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_possible_mask), ncpu = 0;
>> + cpu < num_possible_cpus() && ncpu < symnum;
>> + cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask), ncpu++)
>> + ;
>
> That is max_t(unsigned, cpumask_last(cpu_possible_mask), symnum)
I think it should be:
- cpu < num_possible_cpus() && ncpu < symnum;
+ ncpu < symnum;
Alex?
>
> Rest and other kernel patches look good to me
>
> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> -Andi
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists