linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180606191205.27b1290c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 6 Jun 2018 19:12:05 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree

Hi Greg,

Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got conflicts in:

  drivers/staging/ipx/af_ipx.c
  drivers/staging/ipx/ipx_proc.c

between commits:

  fddda2b7b521 ("proc: introduce proc_create_seq{,_data}")
  db5051ead64a ("net: convert datagram_poll users tp ->poll_mask")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  7a2e838d28cf ("staging: ipx: delete it from the tree")

from the staging tree.

I fixed it up (I just removed the files) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped