[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:26:22 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux@...linux.org.uk, changbin.du@...el.com,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, kbuild-all@...org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, changbin.du@...il.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] kernel hacking: new config NO_AUTO_INLINE to
disable compiler auto-inline optimizations
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 16:26:00 +0200
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> Looks like the greybus code above is working as intended by checking for
> unterminated string after the strncpy, even if this does now triggers
> the truncation warning.
Ah, yes I now see that. Thanks for pointing it out. But perhaps it
should also add the "- 1" to the strncpy() so that gcc doesn't think
it's a mistake.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists