lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Jun 2018 23:48:14 +0000
From:   Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Clean up the code comment in slab kmem_cache
 struct

On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Baoquan He wrote:

> I am back porting Thomas's sl[a|u]b freelist randomization feature to
> our distros, need go through slab code for better understanding. From
> git log history, they were 'obj_offset' and 'obj_size'. Later on
> 'obj_size' was renamed to 'object_size' in commit 3b0efdfa1e("mm, sl[aou]b:
> Extract common fields from struct kmem_cache") which is from your patch.
> With my understanding, I guess you changed that on purpose because
> object_size is size of each object, obj_offset is for the whole cache,
> representing the offset the real object starts to be stored. And putting
> them separately is for better desribing them in code comment and
> distinction, e.g 'object_size' is in "4) cache creation/removal",
> while 'obj_offset' is put alone to indicate it's for the whole.

obj_offset only applies when CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG is set. Ok so that screwy
name also indicates that something special goes on.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ