linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] IB/mad: Use IDR instead of per-port list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180607222646.GX14597@mellanox.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Jun 2018 16:26:46 -0600
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     hans.westgaard.ry@...cle.com, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>,
        Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>,
        Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
        Pravin Shedge <pravin.shedge4linux@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] IB/mad: Use IDR instead of per-port list

On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 12:08:32PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
> Hans reports a bug where the mlx4 driver uses the MSB of the agent number
> to store slave number, meaning we can only use agent numbers up to 2^24.
> Fix this by using an IDR to assign the agent numbers and also look up the
> agent when a MSD packet is received.
> 
> I've changed the locking substantially, so this may well have a
> performance issue.  There are a few different possibilities for fixing
> that, including moving to an RCU-based lookup.

I do like this better than the last series..

This are is somewhat performance sensitive and it would be nice to
avoid this global lock.

What about using a read/write spinlock instead of the IDR internal
lock? Then all the per-port reading threads calling find_mad_agent can
run concurrently..

Thanks,
Jason