[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a169ba7f-53f2-cf9a-a9ee-daffd6b53279@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 15:54:01 +0530
From: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<paul@...an.com>, <t-kristo@...com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<bcousson@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] bus: ti-sysc: Add support for software reset
Hi,
On Thursday 07 June 2018 01:05 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com> [180606 06:14]:
>> +static int sysc_reset(struct sysc *ddata)
>> +{
>> + int offset = ddata->offsets[SYSC_SYSCONFIG];
>> + int val = sysc_read(ddata, offset);
>> +
>> + val |= (0x1 << ddata->cap->regbits->srst_shift);
>> + sysc_write(ddata, offset, val);
>> +
>> + /* Poll on reset status */
>> + if (ddata->cfg.quirks & SYSC_QUIRK_RESET_STATUS) {
>> + offset = ddata->offsets[SYSC_SYSSTATUS];
>> +
>> + return readl_poll_timeout(ddata->module_va + offset, val,
>> + (val & ddata->cfg.syss_mask) == 0x0,
>> + 100, MAX_MODULE_SOFTRESET_WAIT);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> I wonder if we should also add SYSS_QUIRK_RESET_STATUS in
> addition to SYSC_QUIRK_RESET status to make it easy to
> read the right register?
I assumed SYSC_QUIRK is the prefix to indicate the ti-sysc driver not
the register. Are there layouts in which the reset status bit is in the
sysconfig register rather than the sysstatus register?
Thanks,
Faiz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists