[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kzLg2Y2oV0PNTGLP-2ZzW9q_GitR+WSAyHjNZJ2PPbnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 14:43:12 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clang-format: Set IndentWrappedFunctionNames false
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:18 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 14:15 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> The true option causes this indenting for functions:
>>
>> static struct something_very_very_long *
>> function(void *arg)
>> {
>>
>> While a quick survey suggests that the usual Linux fallback is the GNU
>> style:
>>
>> static struct something_very_very_long *
>> function(void *arg)
>>
> []
>> AFAIK the above describes the more common choice in the code base?
>>
>> Not sure who's tree this is supposed to go through.. Andrew I guess?
>
> I believe so yes.
>
> I expect there will be more refinements to .clang-formata
> as perhaps more people experiment with it too.
Yes, indeed! The version I committed was an initial approximation --
don't expect it to be the "final" or "official" one!
Cheers,
Miguel
>
> Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>
>> diff --git a/.clang-format b/.clang-format
>> index faffc0d5af4eeb..1d5da22e0ba50c 100644
>> --- a/.clang-format
>> +++ b/.clang-format
>> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ IncludeIsMainRegex: '(Test)?$'
>> IndentCaseLabels: false
>> #IndentPPDirectives: None # Unknown to clang-format-5.0
>> IndentWidth: 8
>> -IndentWrappedFunctionNames: true
>> +IndentWrappedFunctionNames: false
>> JavaScriptQuotes: Leave
>> JavaScriptWrapImports: true
>> KeepEmptyLinesAtTheStartOfBlocks: false
Powered by blists - more mailing lists