[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180607133306.vcrtxidfzv7x7e73@um.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 16:33:06 +0300
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, bp@...e.de, Kan.liang@...el.com,
Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
peterz@...radead.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com, david@...hat.com,
bsd@...hat.com, yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com, joro@...tes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/12] perf/x86/intel/pt: Add new bit definitions for
Intel PT MSRs
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:52:06PM +0800, Luwei Kang wrote:
> These bit definitions are use for emulate MSRs read/write
> for KVM. For example, IA32_RTIT_CTL.FabricEn[bit 6] is available
> only when CPUID.(EAX=14H, ECX=0):ECX[bit 3] = 1. If KVM guest
> try to set this bit with CPUID.(EAX=14H, ECX=0):ECX[bit3] = 0
> a #GP would be injected to KVM guest.
Do we have anything in the guest that this feature will work with?
Regards,
--
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists