linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 10/12] KVM: x86: Implement Intel Processor Trace MSRs read/write emulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180607141237.ruhg44wuepkf4nhz@um.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Jun 2018 17:12:37 +0300
From:   Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@...el.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, bp@...e.de, Kan.liang@...el.com,
        Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com, david@...hat.com,
        bsd@...hat.com, yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com, joro@...tes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/12] KVM: x86: Implement Intel Processor Trace MSRs
 read/write emulation

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:52:13PM +0800, Luwei Kang wrote:
> +	/*
> +	 * Any MSR write that attempts to change bits marked reserved will
> +	 * case a #GP fault.
> +	 */
> +	if (data & vmx->pt_desc.ctl_bitmask)
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Any attempt to modify IA32_RTIT_CTL while TraceEn is set will
> +	 * result in a #GP unless the same write also clears TraceEn.
> +	 */
> +	if ((vmx->pt_desc.guest.ctl & RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN) &&
> +		((vmx->pt_desc.guest.ctl ^ data) & ~RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN))
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * WRMSR to IA32_RTIT_CTL that sets TraceEn but clears this bit
> +	 * and FabricEn would cause #GP, if
> +	 * CPUID.(EAX=14H, ECX=0):ECX.SNGLRGNOUT[bit 2] = 0
> +	 */
> +	if ((data & RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN) && !(data & RTIT_CTL_TOPA) &&
> +		!(data & RTIT_CTL_FABRIC_EN) &&
> +		!pt_cap_decode(vmx->pt_desc.caps, PT_CAP_single_range_output))
> +		return 1;

Ah, I see. But afaict this is still wrong: PT_CAP_single_range_output is
only about allowing !RTIT_CTL_TOPA, FABRIC_EN should be checked separately
against the new capability that you added in 4/12.

Regards,
--
Alex