linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16 270/410] arm64: __show_regs: Only resolve kernel symbols when running at EL1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1528380321.245798275@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "NCSC Security" <security@...c.gov.uk>,
        "Will Deacon" <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 270/410] arm64: __show_regs: Only resolve kernel
 symbols when running at EL1

3.16.57-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>

commit a06f818a70de21b4b3b4186816094208fc7accf9 upstream.

__show_regs pretty prints PC and LR by attempting to map them to kernel
function names to improve the utility of crash reports. Unfortunately,
this mapping is applied even when the pt_regs corresponds to user mode,
resulting in a KASLR oracle.

Avoid this issue by only looking up the function symbols when the register
state indicates that we're actually running at EL1.

Reported-by: NCSC Security <security@...c.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -197,8 +197,15 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	}
 
 	show_regs_print_info(KERN_DEFAULT);
-	printk("pc : %pS\n", (void *)regs->pc);
-	printk("lr : %pS\n", (void *)lr);
+
+	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
+		printk("pc : %pS\n", (void *)regs->pc);
+		printk("lr : %pS\n", (void *)lr);
+	} else {
+		printk("pc : %016llx\n", regs->pc);
+		printk("lr : %016llx\n", lr);
+	}
+
 	printk("sp : %016llx pstate : %08llx\n", sp, regs->pstate);
 	for (i = top_reg; i >= 0; i--) {
 		printk("x%-2d: %016llx ", i, regs->regs[i]);