[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1528380321.88828682@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Will Deacon" <will.deacon@....com>,
"Michael Weiser" <michael.weiser@....de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 269/410] arm64: Remove unimplemented syscall log message
3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@....de>
commit 1962682d2b2fbe6cfa995a85c53c069fadda473e upstream.
Stop printing a (ratelimited) kernel message for each instance of an
unimplemented syscall being called. Userland making an unimplemented
syscall is not necessarily misbehaviour and to be expected with a
current userland running on an older kernel. Also, the current message
looks scary to users but does not actually indicate a real problem nor
help them narrow down the cause. Just rely on sys_ni_syscall() to return
-ENOSYS.
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@....de>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: Deleted code was slightly different]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -251,14 +251,6 @@ asmlinkage long do_ni_syscall(struct pt_
}
#endif
- if (show_unhandled_signals && printk_ratelimit()) {
- pr_info("%s[%d]: syscall %d\n", current->comm,
- task_pid_nr(current), (int)regs->syscallno);
- dump_instr("", regs);
- if (user_mode(regs))
- __show_regs(regs);
- }
-
return sys_ni_syscall();
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists