[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1528380321.820524984@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@...com>,
"" <socketpair@...il.com>, "Al Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Willy Tarreau" <w@....eu>,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
"Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 201/410] pipe: refactor argument for account_pipe_buffers()
3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
commit 3734a13b96ebf039b293d8d37a934fd1bd9e03ab upstream.
This is a preparatory patch for following work. account_pipe_buffers()
performs accounting in the 'user_struct'. There is no need to pass a
pointer to a 'pipe_inode_info' struct (which is then dereferenced to
obtain a pointer to the 'user' field). Instead, pass a pointer directly
to the 'user_struct'. This change is needed in preparation for a
subsequent patch that the fixes the limit checking in alloc_pipe_info()
(and the resulting code is a little more logical).
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/7277bf8c-a6fc-4a7d-659c-f5b145c981ab@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: <socketpair@...il.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/pipe.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -590,10 +590,10 @@ pipe_fasync(int fd, struct file *filp, i
return retval;
}
-static void account_pipe_buffers(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
+static void account_pipe_buffers(struct user_struct *user,
unsigned long old, unsigned long new)
{
- atomic_long_add(new - old, &pipe->user->pipe_bufs);
+ atomic_long_add(new - old, &user->pipe_bufs);
}
static bool too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(struct user_struct *user)
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ struct pipe_inode_info *alloc_pipe_info(
pipe->r_counter = pipe->w_counter = 1;
pipe->buffers = pipe_bufs;
pipe->user = user;
- account_pipe_buffers(pipe, 0, pipe_bufs);
+ account_pipe_buffers(user, 0, pipe_bufs);
mutex_init(&pipe->mutex);
return pipe;
}
@@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ void free_pipe_info(struct pipe_inode_in
{
int i;
- account_pipe_buffers(pipe, pipe->buffers, 0);
+ account_pipe_buffers(pipe->user, pipe->buffers, 0);
free_uid(pipe->user);
for (i = 0; i < pipe->buffers; i++) {
struct pipe_buffer *buf = pipe->bufs + i;
@@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ static long pipe_set_size(struct pipe_in
memcpy(bufs + head, pipe->bufs, tail * sizeof(struct pipe_buffer));
}
- account_pipe_buffers(pipe, pipe->buffers, nr_pages);
+ account_pipe_buffers(pipe->user, pipe->buffers, nr_pages);
pipe->curbuf = 0;
kfree(pipe->bufs);
pipe->bufs = bufs;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists