[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1528380321.335516866@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@...nel.org>, "Benjamin LaHaise" <bcrl@...ck.org>,
"Jann Horn" <jannh@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 358/410] fs/aio: Use RCU accessors for
kioctx_table->table[]
3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
commit d0264c01e7587001a8c4608a5d1818dba9a4c11a upstream.
While converting ioctx index from a list to a table, db446a08c23d
("aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3") missed tagging
kioctx_table->table[] as an array of RCU pointers and using the
appropriate RCU accessors. This introduces a small window in the
lookup path where init and access may race.
Mark kioctx_table->table[] with __rcu and use the approriate RCU
accessors when using the field.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Fixes: db446a08c23d ("aio: convert the ioctx list to table lookup v3")
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
- Drop changes to aio_ring_mremap()
-
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/aio.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -68,9 +68,9 @@ struct aio_ring {
#define AIO_RING_PAGES 8
struct kioctx_table {
- struct rcu_head rcu;
- unsigned nr;
- struct kioctx *table[];
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
+ unsigned nr;
+ struct kioctx __rcu *table[];
};
struct kioctx_cpu {
@@ -588,9 +588,9 @@ static int ioctx_add_table(struct kioctx
while (1) {
if (table)
for (i = 0; i < table->nr; i++)
- if (!table->table[i]) {
+ if (!rcu_access_pointer(table->table[i])) {
ctx->id = i;
- table->table[i] = ctx;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(table->table[i], ctx);
spin_unlock(&mm->ioctx_lock);
/* While kioctx setup is in progress,
@@ -765,8 +765,8 @@ static int kill_ioctx(struct mm_struct *
spin_lock(&mm->ioctx_lock);
table = rcu_dereference_raw(mm->ioctx_table);
- WARN_ON(ctx != table->table[ctx->id]);
- table->table[ctx->id] = NULL;
+ WARN_ON(ctx != rcu_access_pointer(table->table[ctx->id]));
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(table->table[ctx->id], NULL);
spin_unlock(&mm->ioctx_lock);
/* free_ioctx_reqs() will do the necessary RCU synchronization */
@@ -827,7 +827,8 @@ void exit_aio(struct mm_struct *mm)
skipped = 0;
for (i = 0; i < table->nr; ++i) {
- struct kioctx *ctx = table->table[i];
+ struct kioctx *ctx =
+ rcu_dereference_protected(table->table[i], true);
if (!ctx) {
skipped++;
@@ -1022,7 +1023,7 @@ static struct kioctx *lookup_ioctx(unsig
if (!table || id >= table->nr)
goto out;
- ctx = table->table[id];
+ ctx = rcu_dereference(table->table[id]);
if (ctx && ctx->user_id == ctx_id) {
percpu_ref_get(&ctx->users);
ret = ctx;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists